Bubbles
Master
Can I ask what made the decision to put a cap on the number of guilds that can be in an aliance? I thought this was not going to be implemented now.
Sent from my XT1080 using Tapatalk
Sent from my XT1080 using Tapatalk
Guilds and aliances
- Thread starter Bubbles
- Start date
- Status
GluttonySDS
Grandmaster
seems anti sandbox to me
Blaine the Gypsy
Grandmaster
Strange things happening... it shows in the cards weird stuff
Deadpool
Grandmaster
Yeah I don't get why it matters how big an alliance gets. If this was really an issue then why have the new guild system implemented in the first place?
Silly Santa
Grandmaster
I assume this was due to the alliance I am in.
- There are a lot of guilds in it , but a lot are small.. and even my own guild usually does not have more than 1 page of active people on at any given time.. and when you factor in peoples "alts" , its even less active than a guild like mine looks
- This will make PVP/PK zergs like ]${ and EQMS easier to be able to go out zerging other guilds/alliances - some of whom are not 100% PVP guilds/alliances... since EQ/MS and $ both have like 40-50% of the pvpers on this shard in 1 of their 2 guilds ,
- There are a lot of other people out there who are new (17k names in the NEW guild) or are not in this alliance.. (2 guilds recently left this alliance btw and 1 is going inactive )... its so easy to make a large guild on this shard.. and a large alliance... but I don't see why a lot of people have a difficult time in doing it.
- Unlike 9/10 other guilds... I do welcome new players into my guild and help them start out.. a lot end up joining my guild coming from the NEW guild.. but in doing so , it landed me at around 300 names on my roster... and I have another dead guild from 2 years ago that's inactive but has around 150 names on it :/
I just think unfortunately this change benefits $ and EQMS the most.. and a lot of people will not favor this change
Last edited by a moderator:
Experience
Grandmaster
I agree with Silly. And I'd also like to point out that this really hurts that small guilds like mine, because when it comes down to the chopping block decision it will leave us in between a rock and a hard place....
Silly Santa
Grandmaster
On a side note - I did boot every inactive player on my roster that last logged on in 2014... which removed about 40 names from my list.
Cinder
Master
I thought this was fixed....
Swayze
Grandmaster
Maybe you could consider merging some of the smaller guilds into one of the bigger ones? That would solve everything. It would even clean out rosters from inactive members.
Swayze
Grandmaster
I assume this was due to the alliance I am in.
- There are a lot of guilds in it , but a lot are small.. and even my own guild usually does not have more than 1 page of active people on at any given time.. and when you factor in peoples "alts" , its even less active than a guild like mine looks
- This will make PVP/PK zergs like ]${ and EQMS easier to be able to go out zerging other guilds/alliances - some of whom are not 100% PVP guilds/alliances... since EQ/MS and $ both have like 40-50% of the pvpers on this shard in 1 of their 2 guilds ,
- There are a lot of other people out there who are new (17k names in the NEW guild) or are not in this alliance.. (2 guilds recently left this alliance btw and 1 is going inactive )... its so easy to make a large guild on this shard.. and a large alliance... but I don't see why a lot of people have a difficult time in doing it.
- Unlike 9/10 other guilds... I do welcome new players into my guild and help them start out.. a lot end up joining my guild coming from the NEW guild.. but in doing so , it landed me at around 300 names on my roster... and I have another dead guild from 2 years ago that's inactive but has around 150 names on it :/
I just think unfortunately this change benefits $ and EQMS the most.. and a lot of people will not favor this change
Also how would the limitations on alliances help eqms or $ in any way?
Skye Wolfbane
Governor of Trinsic
It shouldn't. I'm pretty sure it's a 3-guild max, not a limit on the number of people in each guild.
wreckognize
Grandmaster
exactly. what we really need is a guild size cap. there should only be 12 players allowed per guild. If you can't find a seat at the round table, then why are you still here? etc etc.
This whole thing doesn't make sense. If limits are going to be made on the amount of guilds in an alliance, but not limit guild size, what do these rule changes really do other than piss off some players. Wouldn't people just then join into a super huge guild with guild titles reflecting their "house" or where they came from?
sampsonized
Master
Really unnecessary change IMO. If it ain't broke don't fix it!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Bubbles
Master
Why don't they just limit the number of guilds allowed in game as a whole. Make them like houses if players become inactive drop the guild, or make a tithing requirement to gold sink monthly based on number of players. Just a thought.
Sent from my XT1080 using Tapatalk
Sent from my XT1080 using Tapatalk
Swayze
Grandmaster
Wut? The amount of guilds on the server is no broken and this suggestion is completely unrelated to the OP.
The issue in this thread is people crying that they cant have a 10 guild alliance. Who cares?
Bubbles
Master
First of all, don't talk to me like I'm your kid! Second of all, I know what the original post was because I posted it. Third of all I was suggesting other options. I guess what everyone's says about you is true.
Sent from my XT1080 using Tapatalk
Last edited by a moderator:
OH SNAP!
- Status