Lexington
Grandmaster
Yes it is
Nope just most expensive and time consuming to build....
You need to see a meta archer one shot an arch ice fiend and then tell me my tamers is the best weapon in game
Yes it is
Then don't use a meta pet.. fixed
I hope Staff takes the time to read our ideas and considers our issues.
I'm all for stat loss in its current state if we just get a little better skill gain rate and find a way to fix the certain skills that don't regain on their own.
Why are you ok with it.............? What good did it really do?
It prevents every pet you see from being as burly as possible. Especially with metas that can have way over GM skills. These pets already have the potential to wreck hard (people and monsters). It allows them to be weakened through some mechanism. Even pets with 70 resist and magery somewhere in the 90's are pretty damn good. Everyone just seems obsessed with keeping their skills at perfect.
It provides at least some deterrence to every single person being a tamer. Even though when you look around dungeons and events, it kind of seems like the stat loss is low enough such that everyone and their mother has a tamer (or several).
It separates good tamers from shitty tamers. Those that are incredible at managing their pets get the reward of having it die less and have higher skills. They get an advantage over shitty tamers by being good. Those that are literally all kill spam bots are going to suffer for trying to take advantage of an outrageously powerful tool and sucking at it.
Classic risk/reward arguments. Tamers have the potential for massive rewards. Some appropriate risk should come with it.
My thoughts exactly Lexington!
You are correct about most every thing you say Kurtis, and I agree.
My pet against spawn is awesome, and I can maintain It's health.
But to have a bunch of Blues, pet griefers pop in and gank it , with no consequences, is the issue.
Basically, they go around with the soul reason of killing pets, putting us in the pet skill loss dilemma.