One last LOL

[eric_azria]

IPY3

LOL

 

[Loki]

Lol

 

[Kavu]

rofl

 

[God.RG]

Bahahahahahah

 

[wreckognize]

 

[Kavu]

there should be a limit on fucking signatures... holy shit

 

[bin Laden]

LOLOLOL

 

[Metalhead-]

What signatures? I see none!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[zoneseek]

You guys are just like the blizzard fanboys bowing down and sucking dick over at mmo-champ, laughing at every mmo that isn't wow (including UO). Competition is never a bad thing in gaming, it should be embraced. It would have only made competing shards stronger.

 

[Bromista]

Sooo two days ago. Or three. I couldn't care less.

 

[Metalhead-]

You guys are just like the blizzard fanboys bowing down and sucking dick over at mmo-champ, laughing at every mmo that isn't wow (including UO). Competition is never a bad thing in gaming, it should be embraced. It would have only made competing shards stronger.

You forget that this is Ultima Online. The most ruthless cutthroat MMORPG ever made...



No wait. That was Meridian59.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[eric_azria]

Actually the more shards that exist, the thinner the remaining UO population is spread. 1 server is all we need. To anyone who thinks otherwise : suck it, you're an idiot.

 

[zoneseek]

Wrong. People just don't play on shards that they don't like. There are way more potential UO players than any one shard sees. Tons of people won't play UO forever for a number of reasons, ive personally seen multiple people turn down ever logging in due to stat loss and mounts. The more competition, the better the top shards have to perform to keep the population. To anyone that thinks otherwise: you're an idiot. And a dick sucking fanboy like the wow crowd.

 

[Illy]

Wrong. People just don't play on shards that they don't like. There are way more potential UO players than any one shard sees. Tons of people won't play UO forever for a number of reasons, ive personally seen multiple people turn down ever logging in due to stat loss and mounts. The more competition, the better the top shards have to perform to keep the population. To anyone that thinks otherwise: you're an idiot. And a dick sucking fanboy like the wow crowd.

Lahey! You're drunk again.

 

[zoneseek]

couplea drinks

 

[Drakken Payne]

Actually the more shards that exist, the thinner the remaining UO population is spread. 1 server is all we need. To anyone who thinks otherwise : suck it, you're an idiot.

If that were true we'd all be playing on OSI still.

 

[eric_azria]

If that were true we'd all be playing on OSI still.

Osi isn't free.

We play free servers.

Try again.

 

[Drakken Payne]

Osi isn't free.

We play free servers.

Try again.

You didn't specify only free servers.

My statement still stands, even so. If we only needed one then we'd all still be playing the original.

But, to play along with you...If your statement were true everyone would be playing ________ (whatever free server you want fill that blank with).

Competition encourages people to improve things.

 

[Guttersnipe]

If that were true we'd all be playing on OSI still.

Honestly, I think a lot of people would have stuck with OSI if they had bothered making a classic shard with Fel rules without the post AoS bullshit.

 

[Desi]

I won't lie. I'm bummed. Old friends were on board.. Now, to persuade them here.