Killing blue pets on a blue should give counts

[GluttonySDS]

Ive said it many times, killing a persons pet is way more costly than killing that person themselves.... not sure why this hasnt been changed yet.

Ask most PVErs -- what is worse to them, getting killed by a PK but having their meta pets live or getting just their meta pets killed by 3 blues with no way to count them.

 

[GluttonySDS]

p.s.

No idea who OP is but he's not in EQMS -- nice try haters.

 

[girana]

let pets count.

i gone make every tamer red on this server in 2 days .

 

[Young Star]

No you should be considered in combat as soon as you attack a tamed pet not after the pet is dead. On top of that the owner of the pet should not be deemed the aggressor if they fight back and not subject to the combat timer unless they have counts.

 

[GluttonySDS]

let pets count.

i gone make every tamer red on this server in 2 days .

yea -- how?

 

[girana]

yea -- how?

hm pets die my pets give counts to tamers

 

[Messremb]

It just needs to be changed so attacking a pet flags the aggressor to the tamer not just the pet, if the tamer dies, he can count whoever attacked his pets. He can also fight back without having to flag on the initial aggressor.

Basically attacking a pet should act just like you attacked the tamer.

Giving counts for every pet killed is dumb though.

Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk

 

[GluttonySDS]

Giving counts for every pet killed is dumb though.

Can you explain why you think this?