Silly Santa
Grandmaster
Damn ... a post of Gluttonys that i like ! Ahhhhhhhh.....lolAgreed -- if you want to take over a champ, kill everyone there... taking over a champ shouldnt include luring the boss 100 screens away.
Damn ... a post of Gluttonys that i like ! Ahhhhhhhh.....lolAgreed -- if you want to take over a champ, kill everyone there... taking over a champ shouldnt include luring the boss 100 screens away.
think this is glutt here singing.Damn ... a post of Gluttonys that i like ! Ahhhhhhhh.....lol
Dont get it twisted. Its not like i am suggesting all rewards should go straight to the bankbox, like @girana was suggesting earlier in this thread. As for someone like me destroying this game? I think you have me mixed up with you know who. If your so l33t like you 'think' you are... dont lure the boss, come on reds and try to kill us and see what happens. Dont be such a noob. Is the only way you could 'win' is to pull a * move and lure the boss out the back door and 40-50 screens away - any chance you get? Where is the consistancy between despise and oaks champs being rubber-banded and not the other ones? Your guild has abused this mechanic for years.
There is no consistancy though. Either all should rubber-band..or none of them.did you even read my last post ?
despise oaks and deciet are rubber banded and the rest not thats done because that it 3 that you can lure 3 not so its fair for both sides
There is no consistancy though. Either all should rubber-band..or none of them.
well its a sandbox game with ton of diffrent playstyles long long time again when this change was made staff tryed to balance everything so all kind of ppl are happy.
well its a sandbox game with ton of diffrent playstyles long long time again when this change was made staff tryed to balance everything so all kind of ppl are happy.
I know hard for most of you guys to unterstand because all you do is caring about your own playstyle.
Bosses are killed so fast nowadays.well its a sandbox game with ton of diffrent playstyles long long time again when this change was made staff tryed to balance everything so all kind of ppl are happy.
I know hard for most of you guys to unterstand because all you do is caring about your own playstyle.
Not me -- I am fine with champs being easier for blues and trammies.... as much as I love PVP, I realize its the trammy men(and women) who keep the server fully populated and realize concessions need to be made because they lack the effort, organization, or skill to group up and complete champs like the rest of us.
This thread has nothing to do about PKs. So - why suggest trammel as the solution to the inconsistacy between champ spawns with some being rubber-banded and others not ?thats why i suggest to add 2 champs in trammel i would bet they would be a great success.
This thread has nothing to do about PKs. So - why suggest trammel as the solution to the inconsistacy between champ spawns with some being rubber-banded and others not ?
It's a very weak argument to say oh you don't want your champ lured then don't spawn a champ that can be lured, stick to these two champs.
I'm sorry but that's not how it works. Especially when staff has said nothing to that effect. Ever.
like i said already a few times in my last posts its done to cater diffrent playstyles.
staff said smt to it when they added it.
So, are you identifying yours and powers play style as not pkers, but as people who like to lure ? lol
Why are people against this change? Want to do a champ, stay in the champ area.
Want to steal a champ? Kill everyone in the champ area.
Sounds like pretty simple logic to me.
why not keep it how it is for years
half champs you can lure other half you cant.
You want easy rewards , for little effort...if you dont wanna try to PK us and contest a champ spawn - then play a thief at said champ spawns. You can get easy rewards that way sometimes.why not keep it how it is for years
half champs you can lure other half you cant.