Search results

In short yes, 120 taming is a waste of gold and time.

I played EVE for a year. It's very time consuming and feels a bit empty. Though I love the games economy though. The pvp's okay, I just wished it was different avatars other than ships.

It's not trammel exactly but players from UO:F will migrate there. There could be a population shift, how big or small we're not sure yet. But I think most pvpers will head there and if that's the case you can say that the pvp or maybe even pk activity will be less.

Honestly I think the current situation is fine, there just needs to be s few adjustments. First adjustment is the magic item drops from mobs need to be nerf. Make it so if people want good gear they go to crafters for gear. This will encourage the crafting market and as a result will encourage...

Well I must add first the first expansion it hasn't been too good. The taming pets are pretty much useless if others without 120/120 aren't able to use them. It would of been much better for tamers to make money taming if the pets required 120 taming but 100/100 taming/lore to transfer and use...

So about they make adjustments to acquiring the gear first before doing the changes you suggested? In fact all those changes will require a lot of adjustments, a lot more than just making the crafting adjustments for slayer armor.

Still won't top a tamer? I mean if you have a tamer and a warrior pve template you're still better off using the tamer for gold.

I guess it take it back on the undead mobs but still I don't see the worth in it if you need 120/120 to use it. There's literally no market for it or a very very very limited one.

I don't think the pets are worth anything considering you need 120 taming to tame it and 120 lore to control it. That pretty much kills the market for it as many people don't have 120 taming/lore and if they did then they could potentially just tame one themselves. In fact the 120 taming scroll...

If that is the case then wouldn't the tamers just go their if it means efficient farming than RDA's?

I am not sure if they're worth anything. If 115 taming is needed for them to be transferable then that removes a lot of potential buyers. Plus they look ugly :(.

I am curious to know it's durability. I Wonder if it's like runic kits where durability is hidden with only 30 uses.

The stats on that are a bit lacking... Dex is only 115 when max is 130, and Int is a bit off too by over 30 points. It's a decent WW but I wouldn't pay that much for it.

I agree it would be nice to be able to farm for gold while playing a pvp warrior template. It would make pking interesting that's for sure. But like you said though if it takes too much time to acquire the gear then it'll cost to much making its uses very limited.

Honestly, in my history of UO and from what I can remember, no other template other than tamers and provokers were capable of fighting out the big baddest of the game. Well sure you could bring numbers but it wasn't worthwhile when you had to share the loot. It's the one thing I didn't like...

It amazes me that people have nothing to spend their money on but over-priced rares and pixels. Free bump btw.

I thought Balrons and liches were not able to be poisoned? I guess I haven't been paying attention.

You tried it in combat? If so had does it fair against balrons or ancient wyrms?

I agree If it costs too much or takes too much time to get the hammer then you need 120 blacksmithing + 120 Tinkering and btw does the hammer have charges? If so then yeah slayer armor could be useless.

It's a good point. If it takes too much time to craft slayer armor then the price will be high, how high is what remains to be seen. IMO the more difficult it is to obtain gear in a setting where if you die you can lose it, it should be relatively easy to obtain gear. But who knows i think it's...